There are a few differences between the original A1 sight and the A2 sights.
A1 sights have a round front post. A2 sights have a square front post. A2's square profile make it a bit easier to get a good sight picture. A1 sights adjust for elevation only with the front post. A2's can be adjusted for elevation with the front post and the rear sight. A1 front sights have finer precision in adjusting elevation - 1" per click vs. 1.25" per click (I think) for A2 sights at 100 yards. A1 rear sights have a kinda difficult way of adjusting windage (a tool is required) and no adjustment for elevation - they simply have a close and long range apertures. The A2 rear sight has elevation and wind adjustments and the two apertures.
This becomes even more complex because A2 sights were available on rifles before the official A2 changes (forward assist, etc.) were made to the rifle itself. Thus, you can have A2 sights on an A1 rifle. Some people also refer to an A3 sight, which is really an A2 sight that is mounted on the removable A3 handle. Confused yet?
The rear sight you ordered is most like an A1 sight - all elevation changes are made with the front post. The idea is to hit the target with minimal chance for error or mis-adjustment. It was those picky Marines and their long range shooting and incessant desire to tinker with things who demanded the A2 sight. The military would typically sight A1's at 250 meters for the short range aperture and 375 for the long range aperture. Of course, this is for standard rilfe lengths and sights. Your rear sight will probably not go in the exact same place as a fixed A1. If the distance between the front and rear sight is off, then the amount of difference in point of impact between the short and long range apertures will be non-standard. You'll just have to experiment to figure out where it POI is at different distances for the two apertures. Hopefully that makes sense.
And yes, the whole A# thing is pretty convoluted and confusing (as are, I suppose, most of my very long posts).






