If FDR could sign an executive order stripping American citizens of their rights and throwing them into concentration camps, is it a farcry that Obama can sign an executive order banning "assault weapons" or "high capacity magazines?"
Daeyel wrote:No, what is he doing? He is saying, the system we have WORKS!
Look at what he's doing, not what he's saying. And what he is saying is not what he's doing.
In 2009, he reversed long-standing US policy and began negotiating a gun control treaty with the UN. He has banned the sale of US M1 Garands, Carbines and other American WWII era weapons from South Korea. He hosted the President of Mexico who called for a new Assault Weapons Ban in Congress. And, he has supported the UN Small Arms Trade Treaty resolution which will be discussed and drawn up in 2012 which will restrict private weapons here in the US.
Of the UN resolution, John Bolton has said-
After the treaty is approved and it comes into force, you will find out that it has this implication or that implication and it requires the Congress to adopt some measure that restricts ownership of firearms,” former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations John R. Bolton warns. “The [Obama] administration knows it cannot obtain this kind of legislation purely in a domestic context. … They will use an international agreement as an excuse to get domestically what they couldn’t otherwise.”
The U.N. Small Arms Treaty opens a back door for the Obama administration to force through gun control regulations. Threats to the Second Amendment are as real today as ever.
Here’s the article that I quoted
http://citizenwells.com/2010/06/15/un-s ... -our-guns/
So, if you look at what he’s DOING you’ll see that it is exactly opposite of what you think he’s SAYING.