Joined
·
5,591 Posts
I really doubt that the NRA will support this.
I'd like to ask them that question though.
Carolyn McCarthy is one of the shrill gun-banners.
She is one of the many who just do not understand that when you take away the right and the means of self-defense, only those who are willing to break the law will be armed -- as was the case in 1993 on a Long Island Railroad train when her husband was murdered and her son wounded by a maniac who used a gun to kill a total of six people.
"Gun-Free Zones" are anything but. They should be labeled as "Zones where only the murderous criminals will be armed, because the law-abiding will obey the law." --- aw, just shorten that to "Self-Defense Free Zone".
I'd like to ask them that question though.
Carolyn McCarthy is one of the shrill gun-banners.
She is one of the many who just do not understand that when you take away the right and the means of self-defense, only those who are willing to break the law will be armed -- as was the case in 1993 on a Long Island Railroad train when her husband was murdered and her son wounded by a maniac who used a gun to kill a total of six people.
"Gun-Free Zones" are anything but. They should be labeled as "Zones where only the murderous criminals will be armed, because the law-abiding will obey the law." --- aw, just shorten that to "Self-Defense Free Zone".
