[Guest]

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtex ... =h110-6257

Some dimwit from Illinois is following the standard Illinois pattern of "Hate everything having to do with liberty" and is trying to relabel the Assault Weapon Ban with a deceptive title: To reinstate the Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act

Every morning, when I say my prayers, I pray for these people to suffer the same fate as Ted Kennedy.

 

[GeneticsDave]

Every morning, when I say my prayers, I pray for these people to suffer the same fate as Ted Kennedy.

Zing! :shock: Ouch... that's harsh...

 

[apollosmith]

Wow. Just wow! I mean, if you're going to do your best to restrict one's constitutional rights, at least have the gall to do it under an properly descriptive title - "Assault Weapon's Ban". It's titled the "Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act" but the words "Safety" and "Protection" appear nowhere in the body.

 

[rdoggsilva]

Wow. Just wow! I mean, if you're going to do your best to restrict one's constitutional rights, at least have the gall to do it under an properly descriptive title - "Assault Weapon's Ban". It's titled the "Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act" but the words "Safety" and "Protection" appear nowhere in the body.

No they are going to try a end run or flanking movement. They are hoping we do not recognize what it really is. Sneaky little devil. :twisted:

 

[divegeek]

Wow. Just wow! I mean, if you're going to do your best to restrict one's constitutional rights, at least have the gall to do it under an properly descriptive title - "Assault Weapon's Ban". It's titled the "Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act" but the words "Safety" and "Protection" appear nowhere in the body.

Bill titles should just be ignored.

They hardly EVER reflect the true content of the bill.

 

[Guest]

Bill titles should just be ignored.

They hardly EVER reflect the true content of the bill.

Bill titles should be used as evidence to prosecute Congress for perjury. And as long as the term gets used in any other legislation, I say they should also be used as "presumptive evidence" of tyranny.

Also: I like my uhsawltweppinz! So Congress can eat me.
http://s262.photobucket.com/albums/ii11 ... k_mags.flv

 

[UTOC-45-44]

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h110-6257

Some dimwit from Illinois is following the standard Illinois pattern of "Hate everything having to do with liberty" and is trying to relabel the Assault Weapon Ban with a deceptive title: To reinstate the Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act

Every morning, when I say my prayers, I pray for these people to suffer the same fate as Ted Kennedy.

So from what I understand ( and i can be stupid at times), this is the revival of the CLINTON ban.

I will loose my 44 Henry Rifle (10+1) and my S&W 4006 (11 rounds+1)), but my Kimber (8rounds+1) will be OK? How about my Benelli Shotgun?

TJ

 

[Guest]

We won't lose any rifles we already have. It just makes it impossible for us to get new ones.

Which'd be sad because I only have three AK's. I need more.

 

[rdoggsilva]

Well I think we will see more of this if Obama gets in. :crying:

 

[Ty]

Every morning, when I say my prayers, I pray for these people to suffer the same fate as Ted Kennedy.

You're not he only one. Who do we write to stop this?

 

[Sam Fidler]

Just look up your local congress critters and let them know how you feel about this issue. I have heard that they typically consider one letter as representative of 1000 constituents so write often if you really want to be represented. Just enter your zip code in the following link and it will show you each of the politician that represent you. Writing to congressional leaders like the Speaker of the House may fall on deafer ears since you do not have the ability to cast a vote in their districts but may still have some affect.

http://www.congress.org/congressorg/dir ... congdir.tt