Joined
·
8,738 Posts
This came up over on OCDO, and I thought it was interesting.
One of the things that police often do during a stop of an open carrier (whether the stop is legitimate or not) is to check the serial number of the weapon. If your weapon was purchased from a private party and therefore there exists no record linking you to it, this check could establish that link. If somehow your weapon had been implicated in a crime, you could suddenly find yourself a suspect. Besides that, unless they suspect you of something more severe than a moving violation, etc., they really have no reason to need to do this check, and therefore they shouldn't.
However, since the serial number is plainly visible on your weapon, if they've taken it for a lawful reason (Terry Stop) they're within their rights to check on it.
So, a very simple solution is proposed: Cover the serial number with electrician's tape. As far as I can find, Utah law does not regulate serial numbers at all, and federal law (Title 18 US Code Chapter 44 § 922 (9) (k)) says:
From an OC'ers perspective, I think covering the serial number may provide another avenue of legal recourse in the event of an unlawful detention, because if the officer removes the tape to run the number, there will be an illegal search added to the unlawful detention.
On the other hand, an officer who doesn't understand the federal law on firearms serial numbers may arrest the carrier for obscuring the number. This would be an invalid charge, just like the invalid disorderly conduct charges that sometimes get made, but it very well might cause an arrest where there wouldn't have been one otherwise.
Comments?
One of the things that police often do during a stop of an open carrier (whether the stop is legitimate or not) is to check the serial number of the weapon. If your weapon was purchased from a private party and therefore there exists no record linking you to it, this check could establish that link. If somehow your weapon had been implicated in a crime, you could suddenly find yourself a suspect. Besides that, unless they suspect you of something more severe than a moving violation, etc., they really have no reason to need to do this check, and therefore they shouldn't.
However, since the serial number is plainly visible on your weapon, if they've taken it for a lawful reason (Terry Stop) they're within their rights to check on it.
So, a very simple solution is proposed: Cover the serial number with electrician's tape. As far as I can find, Utah law does not regulate serial numbers at all, and federal law (Title 18 US Code Chapter 44 § 922 (9) (k)) says:
Since covering the serial number with removable tape isn't removal, obliteration or alteration, it seems to be perfectly legal. However, when interacting with a police officer I don't think there's any question that for the officer to remove the tape in order to see the serial number would be a search, and therefore restricted under the 4th amendment unless the officer had probable cause to believe that the firearm was used in a crime.It shall be unlawful for any person knowingly to transport, ship, or receive, in interstate or foreign commerce, any firearm which has had the importer's or manufacturer's serial number removed, obliterated, or altered, or to possess or receive any firearm which has had the importer's or manufacturer's serial number removed, obliterated, or altered and has, at any time, been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce.
From an OC'ers perspective, I think covering the serial number may provide another avenue of legal recourse in the event of an unlawful detention, because if the officer removes the tape to run the number, there will be an illegal search added to the unlawful detention.
On the other hand, an officer who doesn't understand the federal law on firearms serial numbers may arrest the carrier for obscuring the number. This would be an invalid charge, just like the invalid disorderly conduct charges that sometimes get made, but it very well might cause an arrest where there wouldn't have been one otherwise.
Comments?