Lets be Fair...

Please read and abide by the rules you will find here.
This is also an area to post comments, complaints, and concerns regarding Utah Concealed Carry.

Re: Lets be Fair...

Postby My Trigger Guard » Tue 20 Sep 2011 7:24 pm

Really becuase I thought the wheels on the bus go round and round, round and round, round and round. :beathorse: I was looking for a bus but I guess a horse will do.

I could swear even though divergeeks comments are always better stated then my own, they contain the same pretenses. Its kind of like the conversation is starting back at square 1. But since the OP still approaches the problem with the wrong equation and that divegeek is here to save the day. I can gracefully bow out and go :fishing:
NRA Certified Instructor & Range Safety Officer
BCI Utah Concealed Firearms Instructor

Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it.
Banjamin Franklin
User avatar
My Trigger Guard
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 997
Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2011 8:46 am
Location: Utah

Re: Lets be Fair...

Postby Digigdawg » Tue 20 Sep 2011 7:46 pm

The point of the discussion was not to change any rules. That was not my argument at all, just an example I feel has many correlations to the discussion at hand. I am just trying to understand why/how one policy is fundamentally different then the other, and why some will react negatively to one set of circumstances and not care about others. As in my mind there is no difference (hence the title "Lets be fair..." ). This is how I see it...

-Individual has the right to make appropriate rules/policies in their home/property/business/forums
-Individual/Businesses have the right to refuse service to anybody for whatever reason they choose and can request that you leave their property/space/home/domain/whatever for whatever reason

An example would be if I am OCing on someones property/store and they ask me to leave. The business may feel this action promotes a "customer friendly" atmosphere or because they are jerks, the reason really does not matter, they are simply exercising their rights, not restricting mine. I do not have a fundamental problem with that though it seems pretty silly to me. I will quietly leave and may or may not ever return depending on how the situation unfolded.

Just as if I am posting on this forum and the moderator deems my content inappropriate/vulgar/whatever reason really, he can edit/restrict my post and even ask me to leave(erase my account). Again, I do not have a fundamental problem with that as this is his "house" and as the forum strives to promote/maintain a "family friendly" atmosphere.

I understand that this is a very simplistic example but feel it is a fair comparison. The best argument I can come up to why they may not be the same (with some help) is that I entered/joined this forum with pre-existing knowledge of the rules and essentially signed an service agreement acknowledging such rules. This generally does not the case in most businesses. I do see a comparison when a business posting legal signs pertaining the weapons policy on their property. Though many anti-gun signs businesses post carry no weight in the eyes of the law, I feel that they do communicate (or at least attempt to) the businesses policy allowing me to have pre-existing knowledge of their policies when entering their property.

And to those who feel I bring this up to demonstrate that we are all hypocrites that was not the intention either. Boycotting and punishing a potentially antigun business only agitates said business and solidifies their beliefs on guns/gun owners are bad/evil/scary/whatever they feel. I am certain with perseverance and some time, the CCW and OC community can show that guns and gun ownership is not a bad thing but essential to the well being of the community (a little naive I know). Also punishing local American businesses while we are getting our tails kicked in by foreign entities is a little counter intuitive to me. If a business deserves to be boycotted, I am all for it. I just do not see how the example above is grounds for a boycott.

Just to let you know...
I am not a business owner, just a guy with too many loose thoughts rattling around my head and obviously too much time available. Look at this post!! I wonder if I ramble on like this when I actually speak? I friggin' hope not...

I was also looking for why my perspective may be flawed/skewed as I really do not see a difference. If someone can enlighten me I am all for it.
Posts: 14
Joined: Sat 27 Aug 2011 12:12 pm

Re: Lets be Fair...

Postby Digigdawg » Tue 20 Sep 2011 7:49 pm

What does OP mean?
Posts: 14
Joined: Sat 27 Aug 2011 12:12 pm

Re: Lets be Fair...

Postby DaKnife » Tue 20 Sep 2011 8:05 pm

OC means Open Carry. Further definitions can bequickly and easily found here https://www.utahconcealedcarry.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=4238#p45784 in the glossary.

I must be getting dyslexic, I read that OP as OC. :bangdesk:
Last edited by DaKnife on Sun 25 Sep 2011 10:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.

WARNING: This comment may contain chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm, in every other state it may increase intelligence and knowledge.
User avatar
Posts: 2400
Joined: Thu 06 Jan 2011 12:16 pm
Location: Riverdale

Re: Lets be Fair...

Postby Digigdawg » Tue 20 Sep 2011 8:09 pm

Thanks for the reference
Posts: 14
Joined: Sat 27 Aug 2011 12:12 pm

Re: Lets be Fair...

Postby Snurd » Tue 20 Sep 2011 8:40 pm

OP means original poster or original post.
Posts: 9873
Joined: Sat 19 Jan 2008 10:24 am
Location: SLC

Re: Lets be Fair...

Postby Snowman » Tue 20 Sep 2011 10:51 pm

Digigdawg wrote:... I am just trying to understand why/how one policy is fundamentally different then the other, and why some will react negatively to one set of circumstances and not care about others. As in my mind there is no difference (hence the title "Lets be fair..." ). This is how I see it...

You see no difference... that makes no sense to me. People make rules, and we chose to support or not support them. And we exercise our right to whine and moan about the rules. Some we agree with some we don't... That is so simple, I know you understand it. So... could you try to state your issue more concisely? Maybe someone else understands your point. But right now... I really don't see your point, or question, or statement. :|
Springfield 1911 black loaded target. 460 Rowland.
M&P 40 Pro.
To be voluntarily disarmed is to rely on the honor of the dishonorable.
User avatar
Posts: 1411
Joined: Thu 08 Apr 2010 9:28 am
Location: Ogden valley.

Re: Lets be Fair...

Postby Jeff Johnson » Thu 22 Sep 2011 7:54 pm

Digigdawg wrote:...I feel that the forum can have a "family friendly" atmosphere while not purposefully limiting an individuals right to free speech. Why not have the ability for members to rate/give feedback on posts/individuals so we can police ourselves. Maybe have a rating for content and vulgarity pertaining to what the forum defines as "family friendly".

Yeah, about that. You might not remember Packing.org (PDO), which was a very popular and influential pro-carry web site a number of years ago. I was a member there and thoroughly enjoyed it. It was a great site. Then the owner switched from a system of moderators to a rating system so that we members could 'police ourselves'. It was a disaster. The site went rapidly downhill. That change ultimately contributed (in my opinion) to the demise of the site.

PDO - RIP. :angel:

I believe that we have the best system in place now. We have a very good and dedicated group of moderators. They are all unpaid volunteers, just like the owner and site administrator. They do this as a labor of love to promote the lawful right to self-defense. I know that some people chafe at some of the rules that we have in place, but most people seem to agree that they help make this a better place.

As for your original post, I'm not quite understanding your argument. I'll just pipe in with this: The fact that the owner of a store has the right to establish his own rules does not remove my right to choose whether or not to support his store with my hard-earned cash. It also does not remove my right of free speech to complain to my friends about his store.

In much the same way, you have the right to choose whether or not to support our forum. However, DiveGeek's Costco analogy is a very good one. Everyone who joins our forum agrees to the rules up front.

lmj301 wrote:My only issues with the "family friendly" posting rules is that it also means that we cannot correctly (at times) quote government employees....

Well, we do enjoy the convenience of an automatic word filter. It makes our job much easier, but sometimes results in automatic edits that don't seem to make sense. Sorry about that, but I certainly don't want to disable the automatic filter.

At other times, when it isn't done by the automatic filter, there is normally a good reason for the manual edit by a Posse member. Moderation is not an exact science, and it is often a thankless job. But it is a vital one.
IANAL => I Am Not A Lawyer
NRA Life Member | USSC | CCRKBA | UtahConcealedCarry.com
User avatar
Jeff Johnson
Site Admin
Posts: 5616
Joined: Mon 03 May 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Cache Valley


Return to Rules, Comments, Complaints, and Concerns

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest