JoeSparky wrote:Per Mitch Vilos in his Utah Gun Laws book, the child should have had a note on his person stating that he had the firearm for a specific purpose and he had the permission of his parent/guardian to met FEDERAL law. This is inspite of the parent being there with the child!
DaKnife wrote:JoeSparky wrote:Per Mitch Vilos in his Utah Gun Laws book, the child should have had a note on his person stating that he had the firearm for a specific purpose and he had the permission of his parent/guardian to met FEDERAL law. This is inspite of the parent being there with the child!
That is false. With the Parent right there they are in full compliance with the law. No note was needed as these juveniles had long guns not Handguns which is what Mitch was referring to as per Pg 276 of 4th ed Utah Gun Law.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests