JoeSparky wrote:Karl, For some reason, I suspect a mistake with the "quote" feature; it seems I've said a great deal more than I really said. Please fix!
....
Cinhil wrote:Just as an aside, everything is ready for us on the 31st from 7-9 pm. You can show up earlier and if you do just let them know you are with the Utah Concealed Carry / Open Carry group. It has been arranged for us to occupy the horseshoe section and I have told them our numbers will be around 20 or so. Looking forward to seeing everyone a week from Tuesday at Wallaby's in Sandy. Address is on first post.
Cinhil wrote:Just as an aside, everything is ready for us on the 31st from 7-9 pm. You can show up earlier and if you do just let them know you are with the Utah Concealed Carry / Open Carry group. It has been arranged for us to occupy the horseshoe section and I have told them our numbers will be around 20 or so. Looking forward to seeing everyone a week from Tuesday at Wallaby's in Sandy. Address is on first post.
JoeSparky wrote:Cinhil wrote:Just as an aside, everything is ready for us on the 31st from 7-9 pm. You can show up earlier and if you do just let them know you are with the Utah Concealed Carry / Open Carry group. It has been arranged for us to occupy the horseshoe section and I have told them our numbers will be around 20 or so. Looking forward to seeing everyone a week from Tuesday at Wallaby's in Sandy. Address is on first post.
Cinhil,
When we gather we anticipate that all participants will be on good behavior and leave a positive memory in the minds of all those participating and observing our group. As such, based on the online behavior of ONE individual who has "graced" our forum for the last few weeks I don't believe this will be the case. So, sadly, I will not be participating with this dinner.
I do hope my concerns will be proven to not be valid but at this point I am not willing to take the chance!
Karl wrote:
Don't go crying away just because I pointed out how Scalia disagrees with Bumpylight.
I won't bite you.
And Bumpylight already said he is not coming.
Snurd wrote:Karl wrote:
Don't go crying away just because I pointed out how Scalia disagrees with Bumpylight.
I won't bite you.
And Bumpylight already said he is not coming.
Yay really need to stop being a jerk to people on this forum, Karl. It's unacceptable.
Sent from iSnurd
Karl wrote:Snurd wrote:Karl wrote:
Don't go crying away just because I pointed out how Scalia disagrees with Bumpylight.
I won't bite you.
And Bumpylight already said he is not coming.
Yay really need to stop being a jerk to people on this forum, Karl. It's unacceptable.
Sent from iSnurd
What's your definition? Pointing out that their views are inconsistent with US Supreme Court Justices who are pro-gun?
Pointing out that their incessant verbose repetitions are indicative of Alzheimer's?
Explaining that there are pro's and con's to everything on this Earth whether they like it or not?
Which one is your definition?
Snurd wrote:Go back and read any of your posts, and it's quite clear.
Sent from iSnurd
Karl wrote:Snurd wrote:Go back and read any of your posts, and it's quite clear.
Sent from iSnurd
That's called "shifting the burden". It is a fallacy according to the rules of NCAA debate and of logic and philosophy.
You have the burden to justify what you said. You cannot shift the burden.
So which is your definition. I gave you a list to make it easy on you. Go ahead and pick one or several.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest