Zacharia wrote:You can you use your fingers to draw and fire with a re-curve. Apparently with a compound bow you need some sort of device to do this?
No, you don't need a device to draw a compound bow. Many shooters us a mechanical release, but it's not because fingers don't work, it's because the mechanical release gives you a cleaner, smoother and more consistent release, with no "rolling" of the string off the fingers. This is nothing to do with compound vs recurve, it's the same issue on either and it's about maximizing consistency to maximize accuracy. Oh, and about not getting sore fingers if you don't shoot often.
Zacharia wrote:She won't be hunting with it, so power and speed, and the ability to hold the bow at full draw for minutes at a time like in hunting are not necessary and those are the benefits of a compound bow.
The benefit of the letoff of a compound isn't just the ability to hold at full draw for a long time. A compound accelerates the arrow more smoothly, producing less arrow flex and therefore a more consistent trajectory. It also helps to improve accuracy by giving archers a tendency to aim more carefully. If you're drawing a recurve that is close to the limit of your strength, you tend to draw and release very quickly With a compound you can "settle" into the shot. Most compounds also allow some adjustment of the draw weight, which you don't really get with a recurve.
Zacharia wrote:A recurve bow will make her a better archer.
I don't see how it would.
The only real advantage to using a recurve is that they're less expensive. If she's just shooting for fun, not into competitive shooting, or hunting or anything like that, then a recurve is sufficient, and the advantages of a compound probably don't matter. That doesn't mean they aren't there, just that they don't matter.
Four boxes protect our liberty: soap, ballot, jury and ammo. Use in that order.
Utah CFP Instructor; NRA Certified Instructor for Pistol, Rifle and Self-Defense in the Home; NRA RSO.
I am not a lawyer!