
Is it possible for a school to deny you admission, if you chose to fight it?
_____ George F. Will, 5th of OctoberLiberalism preaches confident social engineering by the regulatory state. Conservatism urges government humility in the face of society’s creative complexity
JTknives wrote:After watching the videos and reading the posts here it got me thinking. What if you could not conceal your firearm because of how your carry rig was. I Just got a thigh rig and your videos got me thinking how would it be handled if i could not cover it up.
http://www.sltrib.com/ci_14421513?IADID=Search-www.sltrib.com-www.sltrib.com
A bill that defines disorderly conduct and protects First Amendment speech was passed Wednesday by a House committee.
HB301, sponsored by Rep. Carl Wimmer, R-Herriman, seeks to remove the word "annoyance" from the current law's language to prevent arrests from being made based on vague language.
"We're repealing that piece of language," said Wimmer, a police officer, "because the term, 'annoyance,' in regards to disorderly conduct is very ambiguous. If you don't know what to charge somebody with, you charge them with disorderly conduct because it's a catch-all."
Wimmer had prepared an amendment regarding the First Amendment implications of the bill, but didn't propose it due to language in it that might conflict with certain laws already in place in various municipalities around the state.
"There are certain cities and municipalities that have time and place ordinances," Wimmer said. "The amendment, as it is drafted, may interfere with that and I certainly don't want that to occur."
The bill passed unanimously and goes to the full House for debate.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest